Reply to Amendments to Policy 8130 re Grandfathering of Current Students

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Amendments to Policy 8130 re Grandfathering of Current Students"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why should they include busing?

1.  If I choose to keep my kid at their current school that is on me.  Just like if I choose to pupil place my kid elsewhere for language, AP/IB, whatever, I am responsible for getting them there and back.

2.  One of the biggest complaints I see on this board is how much time and money is wasted bussing AAP kids to center school.    Why would FCPS  spend even more time and money shuttling around kids that want to stay at their school.  There isn't enough drivers or busses to make this happen or time in the day to accomodate this.   Many of the bus drivers are already doing 3-4 runs each morning and doing it again the in afternoon.  Now, you want to add another route to this.  [/quote]

Agree.

Grandfathering without bussing is the fairest option.[/quote]

Grandfathering without busing is the textbook definition of inequitable access to programming. It’s one of the reasons Sniveling Sandy and her crew has pushed back on it.

It should be an interesting debate at that meeting, but they probably will spend more time with their photo ops than discussing anything substantive.[/quote]

Then pupil placement in general is inequitable since only families who can provide their own transportation can take advantage of it. I don't think you can argue against parent-provided transportation for grandfathering on the grounds of equity and still allow parent-provided transportation for pupil placements for other reasons. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics