Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Keeping and attracting smart federal employees "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PS: Now your turn, "smart person." What do you do?[/quote] [quote=Anonymous]I’m the PP who thanked you for your service. No need to be demeaning. There are many smart people here doing hard work that isnt broadcast.[/quote] My apologies, I thought the comment below was in dismissive tone. Did I misread? [quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Do we not want smart people in federal force? If we do then what are we doing to retain or hire them? [/quote] Put up some job specs and we’ll know how bored we’ll be or not. Also put up the cv of who we’d be reporting too and how they earned their most recent promotions. [b]-thx, smart person[/b] [/quote][/quote] Yes, I think some context was lost here. [b]My read was that the poster was saying[/b], given the current environment, let us know the leadership credentials of who we would be supporting in civil service and how they’re qualified to oversee (and value) our work so it isnt done in vain. We could both be wrong though. Who knows.[/quote] Ah, so that was not you? My response was directed specifically to that person, not the general reader. That was the reason for quotation marks. I think you might have an excessively charitable read on "how bored we'd be," but charitability is no fault. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics