Reply to Pre-Law. Go for prestige or not?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Pre-Law. Go for prestige or not?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][twitter][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just reiterating: if your kids has what it takes to be a successful lawyer (some combination of intelligence, resilience, hustle), they should be able to make their own choices about paying for law school. If they are a high stats person, they will have the option to take merit aid or pay more for a higher ranked school—and also the ability to get a big law job to pay off any loans they do end up with. I would absolutely NOT promise to pay for law school and take this opportunity to make the threshold decision about what to do with your life, and how to prioritize your values in your career, off the table.

I also know many miserable lawyers. Don’t make it too easy for your kid to go to law school. Let them have agency over their life. [/quote]
I'm curious about your thoughts on paying for DC's undergrad. Not sure I understand the strong opinion against paying for DC's grad school. Personally, I wouldn't mind covering law school costs if they choose a full-ride option for undergrad. It's a given that they'd try to get as much merit aid as possible and they are free to decide what they want to do with their life. I've lived debt-free, and I'd help DC as much as I can without compromising my lifestyle. [/quote]

Well the current cost of attendance at Harvard Law School (which does not give any merit aid, still heavily factors parental income when giving out need based aid even for students in their 30s, and has a reputation as being the stingiest among the top law schools in giving out aid) is $120,000 per year: https://hls.harvard.edu/sfs/financial-aid/financial-aid-policy/cost-of-attendance/ Cost of attendance will likely increase heavily over the next few years given all the budget cuts and law schools traditionally being seen as the cash cows for universities. Grad Plus loans are also going to be phased out by the federal government over the next few years, so the only way to pay will be through private loans (which have much less protections for borrowers) or being independently wealthy. If you can support your child’s dreams of being a lawyer, that’s great but if my kid wants to be a lawyer, I can’t fathom even paying a fraction of their likely $150k per year cost of attendance if they make that decision. [/quote]

DP here.  Good for you, but that’s clearly a very personal decision. For example, I would never dream of paying for my kid to go to a private undergraduate school when there are plenty of good state options available. But this website is full of parents who think they’re doing that is the equivalent of child abuse. [/quote]

Not at all. I attended all public schools, in-state university. I was a STeM major.

I’m paying for my kid at an Ivy because he is non-STEM and the Ivy for his major has top placement in his field (not law). He already had an internship this year at a very prestigious co. A Fall abroad internship start of sophomore year and research opportunity.

I don’t care where anyone else goes to school. If he were an engineer I likely would have highly suggested my alma mater that has a top engineering program.

I can’t stand when ppl sh@t on other ppl’s choices. We can pay for it.  But for those who can’t, the Ivies have some of the best FA out there. And, I will readily agree that truly sucks for donut hole kids- that’s why I went in-state myself. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics