Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "What percentage of AAP kids are truly genius level gifted"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The poster above me has hit the nail squarely on the head. Your child's teacher has no idea why they were not selected for AAP, and it's honestly a little surprising they were willing to discuss it with you at all. It's possible that the teacher misunderstands the AAP program, and put in a lack-luster effort on your child's behalf. You would not be the first parent to hit that issue, and you won't be the last. [b]AAP Level IV decisions are made at the county level[/b], your child's teacher put in the packet but has no other insight into what the central committee did or did not think about your child's application. And the process that central committee uses to determine eligibility for Level IV is intentionally kept opaque to parents. People on this board extrapolate a lot about what aspects are weighted more than others, but the reality is we have no real way of knowing what that committee thought when they looked at your kid's application. And neither does your child's teacher. If it helps, we hit a similar barrier last year. Our girl had all 99th percentile test scores and what we thought were strong student samples from us, but the teacher packet was a complete dud. We were rejected, appealed, and were denied again last year. This year, same kid, totally different story. Looking at her teacher packet from this year, you would be hard pressed to believe this is the same kid as the packet describing her last year. My daughter did not magically become a different person, though. She just had a teacher who saw the best in her and encouraged her. She got in this year, no issues. (We did also submit a 138 WISC score this year, which might have helped? But again, there's no way to know what did and didn't move the needle once the packet went to the central committee.) In short, no one knows why your kid wasn't found eligible except the handful of people on the central committee who reviewed the packet. But teachers really do matter, and your situation is deeply frustrating. [/quote] As far as the bolded that's only sort of true. Yes it's a committee of 6 people from a school or schools that are not your kid's school. But they all look at the kids from the same school. Hayfield ES kids are compared to Hayfield ES and Springbrook ES to Springbrook ES and so on.[/quote] Yes but that was not the point of the post. The child's teacher has no clue why the child was not selected for AAP because the child's teacher was not involved in the discussion and did not see anything that would tell her why she wasn't selected. The teacher's assessment that OPs daughter wasn't selected because she is bright but not gifted was bad information because the teacher has no way of knowing that. None of us really know how the selection goes. Do the committee members read through all of the packets from one school and then read through thema second time and make decisions? Do they read them and make a decision and then maybe revise a decision? We know they review all kids from one school at the same time but not if it is a "rank order the packets and then there is a numerical cut off" for each school. It does seem like the teacher gave a good but not great HOPE score. Maybe the teacher evaluated the kids on the HOPE score against one another and OPs child was in the middle of the pack of kids the Teacher had to evaluate? Who knows. The teacher was probably looking for a kind way to explain why the child wasn't selected but probably should have said that she did not play a role in the process after the packet was completed and she is not suposed to discuss how she evaluated kids for the packet. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics