Reply to Do you follow the religion of your ancestors or did you pick your own?

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Do you follow the religion of your ancestors or did you pick your own?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you follow an Abrahamic religion and you're not currently Jewish, then no.  This applies to all Christians (Catholic, Protestant, Mormon, etc) and Muslims (Sunni, Shia, etc)  [/quote]

Not so. The core claim of Christianity is that it is the faithful continuation of Old Testament faith.

Modern Rabbinic Judaism is a separate religion that was developing during the late Second Temple period but then was further adapted after AD 70. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbinic_Judaism[/quote]

As you wrote, they "claim" it.  Still doesn't make it true. Either way, still silly distinctions over made up stories. It's like people arguing over who shot first in the original star wars.  It doesn't matter.  It's a story. Period. [/quote]

So you went looking for truth and beauty, and this is what you came up with? Fingers in your ears and "lalalalalala"?  I remember kids saying this kind of thing in 7th grade, but surely...[/quote]

Nice attempt at trying to change subject. It's not the PP fault for stating the obvious. [/quote]

But it's a very low IQ take, kind of a failure of our education system. Atheist scholars: https://ehrmanblog.org/my-book-did-jesus-exist-an-answer-to-the-mythicists/[/quote]

What's your point?  Even if there were any evidence that a real person existed, all the stories are just that, stories.  In other words, myths.  [/quote]

How does this go in your mind?
1. It's all myth
2. Well okay, some of the people are real, but ALL the stories are myths (which is a kind of self-refuting argument)

Now what? Not ALL of the stories can be myths, because that would mean the people didn't exist. It would be like saying that there was a person named George Washington, but nothing true can be known about him. It's incoherent.[/quote]

Bad example to use Washington.  There is mountains of evidence of his existence.

Using your "reasoning" the cherry tree story is real because he was real (hint it was made up).

Who is the incoherent one?[/quote]

Washington is a deliberate example because of the mountains of evidence.

There are mountains of evidence for the existence of Christ and the apostles.[/quote]

There are more and better mountains for Washington[/quote]

We agree: it's a difference of degree, not of kind.[/quote]

Not really -- all the Washington stuff could have happened -- i.e., none of it is supernatural.  All of the Jesus stuff that forms Christianity (e.g., rising from the dead) is supernatural.  Jesus (or someone) said some good things, but that's all.[/quote]

Supernatural does not mean impossible. You begin with a false premise.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics