Reply to Why the MAHA obsession with chemicals in food, but not the environment?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Why the MAHA obsession with chemicals in food, but not the environment?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]More - PFAs and autism

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33387879/

"From this high-risk ASD cohort, we observed increased risk of ASD in children exposed to PFOA and PFNA. Further studies should be conducted in the general population because this population may have a larger fraction of cases resulting from genetic sources."

PFAs and fertility

https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/centers/core/spotlight/fertility

"Exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) may reduce fertility in women by as much as 40%, researchers from the NIEHS-funded Environmental Health Sciences Core Center at Mount Sinai found. The team reported that higher levels of PFAS in blood were associated with a significant reduction in the likelihood of pregnancy and live birth among a group of reproductive-age women in Singapore who were trying to conceive.

“PFAS can disrupt our reproductive hormones and have been linked with delayed puberty onset and increased risks for endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome in previous studies. What our study adds is that PFAS may also decrease fertility in women who are generally healthy and are naturally trying to conceive,"

These are all MAHA talking points, you are worried about these, right? So.... can anyone explain why every MAHA type influencer is prattling on about seed oils or food dyes and has literally nothing to say about PFAs?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics