Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "New OPM Memo on RTO Implementation — CBAs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://www.barrons.com/articles/trump-return-to-office-federal-workers-bb0ea89d Ignoring a CBA is a breach of contract claim at the US Court of Federal Claims (or Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit). Why wouldn’t the Court issue a TRO? The law is on the side of the CBAs being enforceable. [/quote] In the fall of 2023 the Labor Department ordered workers back 5 days a PP in violation of the CBA. The union tried to negotiate and ultimately sued but I don't think they prevailed. It did delay their RTO until late summer 2024. [/quote] False! Please don’t talk about things you know nothing about. Still in litigation . . . https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ed76d613-7e70-4ebc-8d5f-d6095d58d0e9 [/quote] I know all about it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
