Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "ED applicants, please post your school, the result, and your DC's stats"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Most people who apply to lacs apply to some universities.[/quote] say what? please give a cite for this bizarre geberalization.[/quote] I’m not the poster but it makes sense to me. If you’re aiming for “elite” lacs, there are only so many. It stands to reason that one would cast a wider net with the unpredictability of admissions. [/quote] Yes, as we all know there are only 4 “elite” lacs. Someone alert Carleton and below that they should pack it in. Don’t ever change DCUM. [/quote] Look, with the current exorbitant price tag of college it's reasonable to consider ROI. Many consider a balance between the quality of the education and the brand name. I absolutely know a fabulous education can be had at a Carleton or Grinnell, but the "brand" isn't quite the same. If Carleton gave merit money, it would be a very strong contender. But at $87,00 a year, no. If the money were nothing to us, well then sure, maybe. But I think looking at lower Ivies, Georgetown etc., or the state flagship honors program makes good sense in that case. Yes, because of the name/value ratio. And Oberlin would have been a contender because of generous merit. The calculus differs for every family.[/quote] You have a very warped view of education and the landscape of colleges in the country. Do you rally think graduates of hundreds of colleges aren't employable? Brand name should not be a factor at all because it is a figment of your imagination.[/quote] NP. That's not what PP said. Basically it comes down to the fact that outside of the top tier, schools with significantly less name recognition are still extremely expensive. Whether or not they are worth it is up for debate, but it's pretty clear consumers are pushing back against the cost more than the lack of a name brand per se.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics