Reply to Stanford REA

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Stanford REA"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Stanford wants to admit students who will change the world - more creative or unusual, if not an athlete. [/quote]
Yes, sure. We don't need a ChatGPT bot statement like that. [/quote]

It’s literally what their AOs have said. You can choose to ignore them, but they have made it fairly clear that perfect/near perfect SATs, Olympiad medals, and robotics do not really move the needle. A student with such a profile is wasting their ED/REA opportunity with Stanford. [/quote]

My kid was rejected REA from Stanford a couple of years ago. 1600/4.0.

Rd — accepted to MIT and Harvard.

We are in Massachusetts so we are pretty sure it was yield protection. They knew my kid would be accepted by MIT or Harvard and would go there.  Yield matters for rankings. Stanford brags they reject the perfect kids …. Because they know the perfect SAT/GPA are going to have choices and are not going to yield as it’s not ED.

So I really want to encourage those whose kids were rejected this year to tell your kids to not give up hope. Apply to the Ivies and/or MIT. Good luck! [/quote]

I don't think Stanford is yield protecting.  These days people want to go to Stanford more than Harvard or MIT.[/quote]

Stanfords formula is very different from Harvards. They are not looking for the same kid (9 times out of 10).
[/quote]

Whats the difference in what they’re looking for? The admits, other than recruited athletes, seem similar. [/quote]

There’s a lot written about this. 
Do some digging.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics