Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Hung up on the idea that toxic STBX husband will be the perfect husband for some 25 year old girl"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP it's the sink cost fallacy. You're like the addicted gambler at a slot machine in Vegas. You're worried if you leave the slot machine the next person wins the jackpot. The house always wins. It's a rigged game Get up from the slot machine and leave and don't look back. If a 25 year old saddles up to the slot machine and wins, it's only because the random numbers aligned. It has nothing to do with the investment you already put the in. The odds are stacked against his new 25 year old honey having a winning game. He will soon be some other woman's problem and not yours. [/quote] Haha exactly! I invested 18 years of my life with exH and got 50% of assets and half of his pension in device. The next GF /wife will get bread crumbs from that. Look at Kevin Custer; Mel Gibson exes: the wife who had the longest marriage always wins in the long run. AND doesn’t get to spend her retirement with aging prick for his money. The young shiny thing bears the weight of elderly care and often is short changed after kids etc. [/quote] *in divorce, Costner [/quote] K.C. was just horrible. He tried to keep all assets in his name, they didn't even own a home together. He kept running to the media releasing horrible stories about her. In a community state regardless of a prenup she did quite well. So well, it was sealed and he finally shut his yapper. Many assets you cannot prenup away like retirement. [/quote] Obviously she got something but nearly not as much as his first wife (without a prenup). Not sure you are correct about prenups though - they can protect pensions (make them separate just like any other assets). The only thing prenups can’t regulate is child support which is why Christine fought for it so much. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics