Reply to TPMS magnet changes

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "TPMS magnet changes"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What rationale has the school presented for wanting to make this change?[/quote]

"TPMS Bell Schedule for the 2025-2026 School Year
Last year, our staff expressed an interest in re-examining our bell schedule. We convened a committee to engage our stakeholders to provide feedback on the benefits and drawbacks of our current bell schedule and the ways in which it both benefits student learning and teacher's ability to deliver high quality instruction and was in which it complicates teaching and learning. [b]We used multi-stakeholder feedback[/b] to examine multiple options. Last week, we engaged our teaching staff to provide an update and get their feedback. This week, we will be engaging our 6th and 7th grade students, on Wednesday, through our advisory period. This Thursday, we will be holding a 6th and 7th grade parent meeting to engage our parents and caregivers."[/quote]

Considering that everyone was surprised by this, including PTA leadership, I'm wondering who the multi stakeholders are here. Are they using "multi-stakeholder" to just mean "some teachers" because that's not at all the intent behind stakeholder engagement. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics