Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Why do atheists post on the Religion forum?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]I don’t know where you are drawing any of these points. [/quote] Really? Would you like me to outline them one by one? What Atheists Believe and Burden of Proof : [i]But atheists CANNOT scientifically prove that there isn’t a God either[/i] Pascal's Wager: [i]If you are intellectually honest as an atheist, you have to admit that there is at least some small chance that you might be wrong[/i] Hard Solipsism: [i]We make all kinds of decisions in life without 100 percent belief[/i] and the rest of that dopey paragraph [quote]My argument was in response to his claim that you can’t rationally assert that there is a God, when, in fact, you can. [/quote] Well then why haven't you done that? [quote]I am a former atheist. I know very well what most atheists believe. I used to believe these things myself. I used to mock people of faith until I realized how all of my own beliefs were based on faith. I couldn’t prove any of them. [/quote] This is stupid and false. What other beliefs did you have on faith? That your marriage was a good idea? Most people make those decisions based on evidence. [quote]All we can do is rationally examine the evidence and different people land in different places after doing that. But it is entirely rational for an individual to reach the conclusion that they think it is more likely than not that God exists and they are going to live their life accordingly. Just as it is entirely rational for an individual not to believe that. But neither side has a monopoly on rationality. That’s my main point. [/quote] And I think your point is completely incorrect, evidenced by the fact that you don't hold any other beliefs to that standard. You don't believe in Leprechauns. You don't believe rubbing a talisman will make your lottery numbers come out. You don't believe I have a heard of tiny flying pink elephants in my garage, even though I assure you, I do![/quote] [/quote] [quote]Actually, almost all major decisions in life are held to that same standard and involve some combination of looking at the evidence and then having faith in your ultimate decision. [/quote] Again, you are talking about hard solipsism here. For all of those decisions, there is sufficient evidence, as you admit. For a belief in god, there is not. [quote]You have no real rebuttal to my marriage example (you can gather all the “evidence” you want but it’s always a leap of faith when you walk down the aisle), my example about my wife being under deep cover, or my example about legal standards. [/quote] Yes, I do - you have evidence your wife is a good person, and loves you, and you vow to be committed to each other and the marriage. Plus, you have evidence your wife exists! As for your example about legal standards - that point is for my position, and weakens yours. Are you actually a lawyer? "Evidence beyond a reasonable doubt". That's the standard in a court of law, and that is NOT the standard you use for your god. [quote]I served on a jury once and our decision led someone to go to prison for a very long time. Do I scientifically know that he did it? No. I looked at the evidence and faith filled in the gap. [/quote] No it didn't! Logic and reason filled the gap. If you had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, there is no need for faith! [quote]That’s how all legal decisions are made in fact — reasonable doubt, preponderance of the evidence, etc. [/quote] Again, that's MY position, not yours when it comes to your god. Why not? [quote]It’s also very interesting how the response immediately jumps to juvenile name-calling — “stupid” — which is how I have found many atheists tend to debate these issues. [/quote] I am done not calling stupid arguments stupid. Don't wanna hear it? Stop making stupid arguments, and stop your stupid arguments from infringing on the rights of others.[/quote] [/quote] [quote]“Are you actually a lawyer?” — the arrogance in your responses is astounding. [/quote] Sorry you feel that way. Please tell me the cases you have argued using "faith" rather than evidence, and I will apologize. [quote]Actually, almost all civil cases are based on a standard of a preponderance of evidence which means 50.1. And, yes, after looking at all of the objective evidence, my belief in God absolutely exceeds that standard. It actually goes higher than that — but it is not 100 percent. I freely admit that. But it doesn’t need to be.[/quote] EVIDENCE. You keep saying it, you MUST think it matters - so why not apply it to your god position? Really? [quote]As for my marriage — I never said that there’s no reason or logic or evidence. But at the end of the day it’s a leap of faith and most married people, believers or not, would say that, I think. [/quote] No, it's not a "leap of faith", you are using vernacular for "confidence based on the evidence". Just like when you open a bottle of water, you have confidence, and reason to believe, it is not poison inside. Not faith. [quote]There can be smart people who come down on different sides of this issue. That was the only point I am making when I even started to respond to this thread. But if you sincerely do not believe that, then there’s no reason to further discuss this topic. Have a wonderful day. [/quote] You still haven't made your rational case for the existence of god. You still haven't accepted that your unfounded religious beliefs are infringing on the rights of others. There is much reason to further discuss the topic as it has literal importance and effect. But I understand why you would not want to participate.[/quote] I dont want to participate with someone who calls me “stupid” “dopey” and has a sneering, condescending, sarcastic attitude. It is not talking about a subject in good faith and so there’s really no point. I also don’t like talking with other believers who have the same attitude — which many do. Again, have a wonderful night.[/quote] That’s entirely your prerogative. As I stated, I completely understand why you would not want to participate. But as I also stated, i am finished respecting dumb arguments and stupid and illogical positions supporting them. I am at the point where I think the only way out of this mess is to call them as such. I called the arguments stupid and dopey, not you personally, by the way. But I do sneer condescendingly at Bronze Age myths and the people who expect policy decisions to be made on them. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics