Reply to Mass Deportation: this is going to be expensive

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Mass Deportation: this is going to be expensive "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]See, this is what happens when Democrats incentivize illegal immigration and gaming of the asylum system:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/indian-family-froze-death-crossing-050438619.html

I will never understand why Dems simply cannot understand their lax attitude towards immigration is providing absolutely perverse incentives for people to take such stupid risks.  No other country on earth tolerates this BS. You cause more deaths and suffering by NOT being hard-line about immigration.

[/quote]

Why can’t Republican support e-verify?  Don’t you think a lot of the draw would disappear if it’s wasn’t so easy to employ undocumented workers?[/quote]

Illinois Bans Most Employers from Using E-Verify

FAIR Take | August 2024

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker (D) recently signed into law a bill that significantly hampers employers’ ability to utilize E-Verify to check the work authorization of their prospective employees. Following California’s lead, Illinois becomes the second state to impose restrictions on E-Verify usage.

https://www.fairus.org/legislation/state-and-local/illinois-bans-most-employers-using-e-verify
[/quote]

Not shockingly, this article is misleading. [/quote]

Whether intentional or just poor drafting, the Illinois Legislature’s changes to the Act will effectively ban most Illinois employers from using E-Verify, and possibly prohibit employers from ever taking adverse actions against employees with discrepancies in their work authorization documentation. 
https://www.fordharrison.com/is-illinois-trying-to-bar-the-use-of-e-verify-again
[/quote]

Let’s try a non-employment law firm whose bottom line isn’t impacted by these changes.

[/quote]

The amended Act contains two provisions that, taken together, appear to effectively ban the use of E-Verify in Illinois:

Section 12(a) reads, “Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require an employer to enroll in any Electronic Employment Verification System, including the E-Verify program . . . beyond those obligations that have been imposed upon them by federal law.”
Section 13(b) asserts that “An employer shall not impose work authorization verification or re-verification requirements greater than those required by federal law.”
These provisions seem to state that Illinois employers who are not federally mandated to enroll in E-Verify are not required to — and thus, “shall not” — do so.

2007, the Illinois legislature tried to prohibit the use of E-Verify on the basis that it may be overinclusive, providing inaccurate information regarding work authorization to the detriment of would-be employees. In short order, however, the 2007 law was struck down by a federal court as an unconstitutional violation of the Supremacy Clause. If the most recent amendments to the Act are considered a total ban of all voluntary use of E-Verify, on their face or in practice, similar constitutional challenges may be asserted and prevail.

https://www.taftlaw.com/news-events/law-bulletins/is-illinois-gearing-up-to-ban-e-verify-taft-explains/

If you believe this information is inaccurate and misleading, you can refute it.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics