Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Fascinating article from the WSJ re the methods of an "elite" college counseling firm "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Such a sad state of things! if you cannot be a "top performener" then drop that area. And we wonder why kids have anxiety and mental health issues. Not everyone can be #1 at everything. I for one prefer that my kids did what they enjoyed in ES/MS/HS. From a young age we "required" them to have one artsy/music activity and one active/sporty/physical activity. They got to pick it, but once selected they had to stick with it for the seasons/session we paid for. (can't drop soccer halfway thru just cause you no longer want to do it---but you can drop it at the end of soccer season). As they got older they developed preferences and we let them focus on what they wanted to do. Both kids were in HS band, but dropped their lessons by 9th grade. One did baseball the other was a dancer. Both were good, but not "tippy top". Who cares? They were doing what they loved and learning to work as a team and had friends from their activities. But I would never make them drop something because they are not #1---that seems ridiculous [/quote] But this is the reason why so many are now pursuing obscure instruments and sports, origami competitions, and other crap. The claim is that this "makes them interesting". In reality, they couldn't be #1 doing popular stuff so they excelled at weirdness. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics