Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Sports General Discussion
Reply to "How much did size (height/strength) impact kids athletic chances in middle school? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We have really tough try out teams by this age. I’m curious what impact size had on kids ability to stand out. [/quote] I think it really depends on the sport and the position in the sport. My observation is that for some reason sports that smaller kids can excel at aren't as popular as you would expect given how many smaller kids there are. Soccer, baseball, cricket for example. Baseball height can be an advantage for a couple positions pitcher or first base, otherwise it's not good. Football, height doesn't really matter, except for QB and tight end maybe defensive end. Being tall myself. It's only really an advantage in swimming and ball sports that involve throwing, maybe some racket sports where reach comes into play. That leaves all kinds of sports open, gymnastics, weightlifting, track and field, soccer, baseball, what about cycling. I can't wait until people figure out cricket is an international money sport. [/quote] You are an idiot. Lets talk about the sports you list and their most dominant players: Gymnastics: Fine. Its highly specialized. Shorter can be better. Weightlifting: Hafthor Bjornson: 6'9 Olympic Lifting: Lasha Talakhadze: 6'6 Track and Field: Usain Bolt: 6'5 Soccer: Choices are endless, but lets say retired and current: Ronaldo: 6'2. current, Erling Haaland, 6'4 Baseball: Aaron Judge (plays RF btw, not a pitcher): 6'7 All of these guys are absolute giants. Height matters immensely. As does overall size, which is a compounded function of height. [/quote] NHL: Average size is 6'1.5, but 5'10 and over is big enough (Quinn Hughes is 5'10, Jack Hughes is 5'11, Connor McDavid is 6'1, Auston Matthews is 6'3) NLL (Lacrosse) or D1 lacrosse looks very similar, with an average height of 6'1. [/quote] An average size of 6.1.5 is pretty big. For every 5.11 guy there is a 6.4. And the greatest ever is Ovechkin, who is 6.3 and 240. [/quote] I agree, but it's nice to see players like Quinn and Jack Hughes giving hope to smaller kids (recognizing that 5'10 is SMALL in hockey, whether NCAA or pro). The craziest hockey parents on our teams growing up were on the small side, and while I'll always cheer for their talented, driven kids, a part of me feels like they've set their kids up for failure by going all in on hockey and spending so much time and missing so much school for it. We have a kid in the 95% for height who loves gymnastics, and I'm limiting her to a few days a week of rec gymnastics and encouraging her to play other sports, too, which she's starting to enjoy as much as gymnastics because her size is an advantage instead of a disadvantage. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics