Reply to Why was Michael Jackson not completely cancelled?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Why was Michael Jackson not completely cancelled?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]While I see an argument about not supporting an artist you otherwise admire if said support would contribute to him monetarily, Michael Jackson is dead. Buying every song he ever made ten times each would not contribute to supporting him in any way.

Someone can be a terrible person, a criminal, a monster and still make great art. I do not get canceling the art with the artist especially if said artist can’t benefit from it. I judge art, music, and things in general on whether I like it, not whether its creator comports with my morals. Are we going to cancel Apple products because Steve Jobs who’s now dead was a jerk?[/quote]
His estate which holds the rights to his catalogue still profits from his image and music. [/quote]

Yes, but his estate is not him. He is dead. You are not supporting a pedophile financially since I doubt he sees any royalties in the afterlife.[/quote]
The money should go to victims not his estate. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics