Reply to the coloring of America

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "the coloring of America"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Lots of interesting intersecting issues at play. Will take decades to sort out.

As white men are marginalized more and more, there will be less of a common enemy for Democrats.  That was at the heart of the affirmative action cases.

The interplay between politics, marriage and child rearing will be interesting.  Conservatives are having more children, or perhaps it is more accurate to say that having children is more aligned with conservative values presently. We have no idea how it plays out.

It isn’t a given that as minority groups take power they will continue progressive liberal values (see Michigan townships where Muslim dominated city councils have scaled back on Pride celebrations).

I don’t think a coloring of America leads in a straight line to progressive goals. It will be largely dependent on secularizing immigrant populations and I suspect changing birthing patterns will also be relevant.

-A latino. [/quote]

White men are less than 30% of the population and yet represent about 70% of the leadership roles in America and you think that men are being marginalized?  Yes, they are down to about 70% from nearly 90% 20 years ago, but that's not being marginalized.

Marginalized is when your representation is management and leadership positions is less than half of your representation in the general population, not when your representation is down to 250% of your representation in the general population.

And we wonder why it is so much harder for women and minorities to advance when the people making the decisions have a predisposition to hire or promote people who look like them.  So white men are not guaranteed, but are much more likely to promote and advance white men.

Wait so the plan really is for white men to become “marginalized more and more”? Isn’t that exactly what replacement theory is all about?[/quote]

Glad I am not the only one seeing the "plan" to marginalize "white men".

You know what this is called? Demographic Engineering. And I definitely have seen this trend over the decades...and it’s NOT a good trend.

I met someone years ago and I mentioned that we had a diverse board of 7 directors because there was 1 woman and 1 POC...their response was "that's not diverse enough".

So I think what I'm seeing is indeed demographic engineering...where groups in society are forced to have members with equal % representation from every single different type of demographic even though a a certain group may be only 1% of the entire demographic population. That's not going to ever happen people nor should it ever happen.

The problem is you cannot socially engineer the demographics of society like this. You see it happening with the entertainment industry with the forced inclusion of every single type of demographic.

Some people will read this post and agree that demographic engineering is ok. I personally do not and will not ever support it.[/quote][/quote]

Ick. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics