Reply to Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The guy is clearly guilty.  I’m shocked that anyone with a functioning brain could think otherwise.[/quote]

No forensic DNA tied him to the death. It’s all circumstantial evidence like what he told his girlfriend about the relationship being over (most cheaters say that ) and going fishing.

That doesn’t mean he killed his wife. [/quote]

Just because it's circumstantial evidence doesn't mean he did not kill her.  There's enough circumstances that lead to the conclusion he killed her. [/quote]

Life without parole and lethal injection is an insane sentence for a case with zero forensic evidence.

DNA doesn’t lie. Forensics always give the right clues and tell the truth and yet they’re never used in cases. People use “assumed narratives” and use your words against you. If you got in an argument with your spouse and they vanished  and died the next day, you can go to jail because the courts have decided you had motive because you told them to “get lost”.

That’s how flimsy circumstantial evidence is. Scott telling Amber Laci is out of the picture and soon she’ll be gone and it’ll just be them 2 doesn’t mean he killed her. Only forensics can tell us that and there’s no way he could behead and Dismember her body without the dog altering the neighborhood, the house and car being a huge bloody mess, and the boat as well. Human blood stains do not just disappear easily let alone an entire pool of blood from beheading. A white boat and carpeted house and car could not be  that clean with a gruesome crime like that [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics