Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The guy is clearly guilty. I’m shocked that anyone with a functioning brain could think otherwise.[/quote] No forensic DNA tied him to the death. It’s all circumstantial evidence like what he told his girlfriend about the relationship being over (most cheaters say that ) and going fishing. That doesn’t mean he killed his wife. [/quote] They found her hair in a pair of pliers on his boat that he used to dump her body. Is DNA evidence the only way to prove a murder? [/quote] It is to the braindead morons who have watched too much CSI and are under the impression that an abundance of circumstantial evidence can never add up to… evidence.[/quote] Circumstantial evidence is often wrong and due to grand assumptions and narrative creating. Forensic evidence is always the biggest and most accurate way to solve a crime and yet in most crime cases in the US they’re rarely used because dna testing is new and it’s very expensive for police depts. Looking at phone and email records are easier. Due to his affair, Scott’s own words were able to be used to build a motive and a case. There isn’t any physical evidence in this case linking Scott to the crime. It’s all circumstantial speculation that he’s guilty because he cheated on his wife, went fishing, and ordered porn 3 days after she was missing. That doesn’t mean he killed her. A cheater ordering porn is not a surprise. He received the death penalty and life in jail without parole for a crime that had nothing about 100% circumstantial “evidence”. That’s insane [/quote] I’ll bet you are also unconvinced that OJ killed Nicole and Ron…[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics