Reply to W&M vs Richmond

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "W&M vs Richmond - thoughts?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would add Davidson and Wake - both have incredible cross country coaches and programs, and comparably academically to W&M. Richmond a half step below these two academically, but still a great option! and a very loyal alumni base, similar to Davidson[/quote]
[b]Davidson is a tier too high for the average W&M student.[/b][/quote]

If anything, W&M stats are slightly higher, with a higher percentage reporting, and slight advantages for W&M in ACT and class rank.

[/quote]
Uh huh, with the 40% acceptance rate. You're hilarious[/quote]

Dp, I agree.  William and Mary may just pull a more qualified applicant pool, Davidson is a bit more of a niche school.  Accepted students stats are more meaningful with respect to selectivity than acceptance rate, which always is lower when a school uses ED.  Davidson, like many slacs, also accepts a lot more students test optional than William amd Mary.   Peer schools with a slight edge to William and Mary on selectivity.[/quote]
You think on average a w&m student will make it into Davidson? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics