Reply to Conservatives, raise your hands...

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Conservatives, raise your hands..."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why is this one thing so important to you? Can you explain how it's different from people who wanted to keep marriages racially segregated?

As a conservative, I don't think the government has any business preventing me from marrying who I will (assuming no harm - that is, the government does have an interest in establishing minimum ages for marriage). As a conservative, I am appalled by the idea that the federal government should be involved in preserving your semantic deities.[/quote]Federal government?  Review the 10th amendment please, stop asking for exceptions. [/quote]Looks to me like the first PP is in total accord with the tenth amendment, saying that the fed should not be involved in marriage, which the Constitution definitely does not list as one of their duties.  That's why I think DOMA shoul be declared unconstitutional.[/quote]

You're clearly not involveed in electoral politics, bc you'd be saying, as a conservative, I really don't even care about this issue  But gays prefer that this be the so-called civil rights issue of our generation.  Those poor kids hoping to get an EDUCATION. An actual civil rights disgrace, re Chicago teachers...[/quote]

Really, all conservatives are required to think the way you do.  Because you are all so damn unified.  And a seven day delay in the school year is the civil rights disgrace of a generation.   Right, you mean the inconvenience of arranging for backup care was an unparalleled historical tragedy.   :roll: [/quote]

Nice deflection..... :thumbup: [/quote]

Is that what you call it when someone rebuts the two points in a prior post?  Deflection?  Not my fault he told a conservative what to think, or that he held up the teacher's strike as a tragedy.[/quote]

Never called it a tragedy homeslice, just a sa disgrace.  And remember, ths convo is about the gays, which this conservative really doesn't even care about. Just not a priority [/quote]

Homeslice?  1990 called.  It wants its lingo back, and the Hammer Genie pants, too.

You called it a "civil rights disgrace".  Close enough.[/quote]

Ah the Clinton years....so great, I might vote for Obama just because of him....NOT!  God bless the Clinton tax cuts, spurred years of growth. [/quote]

You are turning into a rolling non sequitur.  When were we talking about Clinton, and wasn't he the guy who raised taxes in 1993, and the economy took off anyway?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics