Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "is boarding school HS a hook for college?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes of course, it signals full pay.[/quote] Why would it need to "signal" anything? Need aware schools get all the finance info and the small number of need blind/meet full need schools don't consider.[/quote] Yes but full pay is more complicated than that. They are looking for other signals. Schools are looking for potential donors/ speakers/ networkers or ppl who will employ graduates. We are seeing how hard it is for grads to get jobs… Our college counselor said it was important for both parents to have updated LinkedIn with clear senior leadership/executive titles conveyed in job titles in common app. The signaling is very important for AO (many of who do look at LinkedIn after 1st pass). The $$$ privilege may not hurt at all at certain private colleges and can actually help. [/quote] Please name which schools look at these factors. Or is this the rumor mill?[/quote] It’s pretty easy to figure out if you parse through data…. Vanderbilt; Rice; Cornell; Dartmouth; WashU[/quote] Look at the % of admitted students in the top 1% of HHI (or better top 0.5% of HHI if they break it down that far). Vanderbilt; Dartmouth & WashU make sense. But isn’t this thread about advantages for boarding school students? Some boarding schools are feeders. Not shocking news.[/quote] Again you are saying "look at these numbers" without any direct evidence or even a logic chain. At best this is a "post hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy. There is no evidence need blind schools make admissions decisions based on economics.[/quote] Wow. That Reddit link makes a crazy case for his income/wealth [i]subtly[/i] impact admissions decisions. “I also think that if there was any doubt beforehand, this further magnifies the questionable priorities that many of these institutions have. I was just at Yales admitted students days and I was surprised how it felt like one in every three or four people I met went to one of the big NE boarding schools...”[/quote] Sigh... no one doubts the stats show wealthy students are over-represented at elite schools. It's because they have every advantage and make better candidates independent of their ability to pay tuition. They are a self-selecting sample. The question is will an admissions officer at a need blind college admit one student over another because of the "signal" that they will be full pay. The answer remains "No".[/quote] The signal isn't that they may be full pay, it's that they may be a donor. Top NYC and LA privates get the same treatment for the same reason [/quote] 💯 this. Or fill some other institutional need (hire graduates as someone alluded to, be a graduation speaker; etc)? That’s true for all private “feeder” schools. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics