Reply to Accused of AI usage. Anyway to prove /disprove?

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "Accused of AI usage. Anyway to prove /disprove?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]AI detection software is horribly inaccurate.  It thinks the US constitution and passages from the Bible are AI generated.  It makes a guess that spits out a percentage and an unreliable one at that.  And yet it's being used to accuse kids who did nothing wrong.

In contrast, plagiarism detection software shows an actual comparison between the writing being looked at and any other existing content that is similar.   It allows for the teacher to make there own assessment.

AI detection software should be banned -- the risk of unfairly disqualifying an entire swatrh of applicants is not worth the odds of possibly catching someone who actually use AI to do all their work.

Sadly, teachers and institutions who use AI detection software are likely to be too complacent with being able to outsource their responsibility for evaluating students, and the companies who sell them the software have their business model at stake and will be very difficult to fight against.  Turn-it-in has already had to put our revisions to its earlier claims of a 4 percent error rate which provide to be completely off.  Chat-GPT actually terminated their detection software because of its unreliability.

And agree with others that the irony is that it will be the privileged families and their kids who can pre-scan their work through detection software algorithms and then revise it to avoid getting caught.  It will be the disadvantaged families who will suffer.       [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics