Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "“Poor Thing” -good all around or just cinematographically "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This film is weirdly absurd and dumb. [/quote] Yeah I just don’t get the idea that this movie had a strong message. Or was feminist. She ran away with a strange man while her brain was a tween at best. That’s not about wanting to be free it’s adolescence. Then for freedom she decides to become a sex worker but it is shown as if the other sex workers chose to be there in the same manner she did. Why not just let her sleep around but with men on her own terms? Then she turned the dude into a goat and we are supposed to see they as a humane choice instead of letting him die or saving him? Emma Stone was pretty good in the role- I don’t think she should have won the Oscar, her childlike movements and phase were really weird to me. I really liked Mark Ruffalo’s performance for some reason but I get why others didn’t.[/quote] It wasn't a humane choice, it was punishment for his crimes. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
