Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "“Poor Thing” -good all around or just cinematographically "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Deeply weird movie. I liked it but I didn't love it. If I had not heard anything about it I would have found the sex scenes shocking. But because that's such a part of who Bella is, I didn't find them gratuitous. It's actually kind of sly how the director has prompted the exact same reactions to the movie that some of the characters have to Bella. I thought Ruffalo was really good in this. Really spot on as a guy who is so incensed that he's unable to control a woman that he planned to reduce to a social pariah that he goes to extreme lengths to make sure she is controlled. I was disappointed that there wasn't more examination of Dafoe's character and his motives and entitlement. The thing that most disturbed me about this was how Bella was created and then the appearance of Margaret Qualley as another subject. And turning the husband into a goat was gratuitous.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
