Reply to New principal will lead with equity

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "New principal will lead with equity"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I worked at a middle school in MCPS that had very few whites or Asians.  One little nice thing about it is that we didn’t have to dance around equity issues since most kids were Hispanic.  We targeted real problems and traumas for specific students.  We had ABC parties to reward students who worked hard.  There were no issues putting kids into the reading classes they needed.  If a kid was acting up staff didn’t get blamed automatically for not connecting to the student.[/quote]

This is actually really heartbreaking. The mere presence of whites or Asians should not complicate targeting problems or traumas for specific students, prevent parties to reward students who worked hard, the appropriate assignment of needed reading classes or automatic blame toward staff for a kid acting up. Each student is an actual individual human, not just a member of a racial or ethnic identity group.

The real truth is that equity itself is a wonderful, noble idea, but the equity leaders who are actually hired to do the work in MCPS and many other organizations are actually just empty suit grifters who want to guilt everyone into funneling as many resources as possible away from those they assume have privilege or power toward their own group, who they see as more deserving. They have not found the secret sauce to actually unlocking the potential in their priority groups, so they go all smoke and mirrors with the optics by depriving high achievers of appropriate enrichment and twisting all policies through a lens derived alongside the bigotry of low expectations. [/quote]

I'm curious what you think "equity" is, that you would refer to it as noble. Equity is equal outcomes, which can only be achieved through force. Equity is authoritarian socialism. In practice in MCPS it means demotivating, demoralizing, and hamstringing students who would achieve so that the gap between them and poorly performing students closes. It also means grade inflation and de-emphasizing or eliminating tests so that progress cannot be accurately assessed. While I was driving my kids and their friends in the car today, they brought up the 50% rule while discussing school. The friend said that she would probably try harder if there were no 50% rule. This, I think is the biggest way equity is implemented in MCPS across the broadest swathe of student population---by instilling in them apathy and laziness--causing them to not try as hard. The noble thing for MCPS to do would be to challenge each and every student to reach new heights (their fullest potential). To the contrary, though, MCPS is not only not doing this---but MCPS is actually expending considerable resources (read our tax dollars) to prevent this from happening.[/quote]

You may define equity as equal outcomes so you have a straw man but that’s not what I mean by it and not what MCPS means by it.

I also just do not believe that story about you driving a kid who said they would have tried harder in class if it wasn’t for the 50% rule. I’m not here to argue about the 50% rule though. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics