Reply to Muriel Bowser bad for DC

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Muriel Bowser bad for DC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Bowser was literally the “moderate” Democrat in the primary. The rest were waaaaaay more lax on crime. [/quote]

vote Republican.[/quote]

Fix your party first.  No way I'm banding together with the Trump party.[/quote]

The Democrat Party needs fixing just as badly. Pot, meet kettle. Dems got DC in the shape it’s in. Voting for more Dems isn’t going to change anything. What’s that definition for “insanity”, again? “Doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different outcome”.  That’s you. [/quote]

And Dems were in power when DC was doing great. It's not a D vs. R issue. [/quote]

Tony Williams and Fenty were very reasonable, centrist  city service oriented technocrats..that is not today's democrats in DC. At least not the elected ones. [b] Where are the Dems like these two[/b]?[/quote]

They’d both be called far-right republicans today. [/quote]

Don't be hyperbolic.  They aren't even remotely far-right republicans.  And probably not even what I'd call technocrats - Gov O'Malley was probably more of a technocrat than those guys, though some of what Williams and Fenty got rolling with their CIO/CTO shop wasn't bad.

What Dems think of technocrats has far less to do with the fact of being technocratic than it does about what they do with the tech and what the rest of their ideology is.  There are a lot of great technocrats, but then there are some like Peter Thiel and Elon Musk who are just...  ugh[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics