Reply to Why Is the Pundit Class Suddenly So Marriage-Obsessed?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Why Is the Pundit Class Suddenly So Marriage-Obsessed?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Because society is struggling, children are struggling and our birth rate is falling.

That doesn't mean that their ideas will work, but I think that's why it's coming up.

Also, control of women is a priority for some pundit groups. [/quote]

Agreed. The research is quite clear that children  raised in two parent households fair much better, even when controlling for income. It really does a disservice to children and society to ignore reality.

[/quote]

There are serious correlation/causation questions that need to be answered before this tells us very much that we can use. [/quote]

NP - No, there aren’t. No one reasonable disagrees that children fare better when there are more resources (attention (since neither mommy or daddy is dating other unrelated parties), money (since only paying for 1 household) etc.) going towards their care. [/quote]

It's selection bias. Because dysfunctional couples can separate from one another and functional relationships are more likely to remain intact, with two parent households, you're disproportionately seeing the results of kids with functional parents. If we forced dysfunctional couples to stay together, we might see the kids doing worse than they would in a one parent household. [/quote]
+1[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics