Reply to Politico: Susanna Gibson's Online Sex Life Was Exposed

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Politico: Susanna Gibson's Online Sex Life Was Exposed"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why would my husband need a picture of me naked when he can just come home and see me naked in person?[/quote]

Maybe he wants to look at you naked when you're not around. If that bothers you, don't take any, and make sure you let him know it bothers you so that he doesn't take any of you in case he does "need" a picture of you naked for some reason.

I think it's pretty horrific how many of you seem to think that posting videos on OF means that the videos are fair game for anyone. That is not how privacy works. That's not even how capitalism works. It is, however, how revenge porn works. I don't understand why anyone disagrees with that characterization of the issue. Publicly outing someone's non-public pornography without their consent in order to damage them in some way is basically the definition of revenge porn. How is that not exactly what happened here? [/quote]

Not even a good troll. The second she clicked "upload" she forfeited all rights to privacy. It's no different than posting flyers on a telephone pole.[/quote]

Did she post the content publicly, or did the place she posted the videos require a subscription, a login, payment, etc.? It's pretty different than posting flyers on a telephone pole, in mechanics, intent, payment structure, etc.

I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, truly. [/quote]
No subscription login payment is required.  It’s completely open.  Pornographers like her perform sexual acts for whoever wants to watch and people toss money at her if they want.[/quote]

You clearly don't understand how OnlyFans works. That is where she posted the videos consensually. That business model is a subscription service. People subscribe to specific content creators. It's not PornHub.

Does your opinion of the situation change now that you are aware that these were NOT uploaded for public viewing?

Is your opinion entirely based on your feelings about what the content was and not on the mechanics of the issue?[/quote]

Does your opinion of yourself change knowing that you are just making stuff up?

Susanna Gibson, a nurse practitioner and mother of two young children running in a highly competitive suburban Richmond district, streamed sex acts on Chaturbate, a platform that says it takes its name from “the act of masturbating while chatting online.”
Chaturbate videos are streamed live on that site and are often archived on other publicly available sites. More than a dozen videos of the couple captured from the Chaturbate stream were archived on one of those sites — Recurbate — in September 2022, after she entered the race. The most recent were two videos archived on Sept. 30, 2022. It is unclear when the live stream occurred.

Gibson, 40, can be seen in the videos soliciting “tips” for performing specific acts — in apparent violation of Chaturbate’s terms and conditions, which say: “Requesting or demanding specific acts for tips may result in a ban from the Platform for all parties involved.”
In at least two videos, she tells viewers she is “raising money for a good cause.”

In multiple videos, Gibson interrupts sex acts to type into a bedside computer. Speaking directly into the screen, she urges viewers to provide tips, which are paid through “tokens” purchased through the site. In at least two videos, she agrees to perform certain acts only in a “private room,” an arrangement that requires the viewer to pay more.
“I need, like, more tokens before I let him do that,” she responds to a request that they perform a certain act. “One token, no. More. Raising money for a good cause.”
Almost immediately, as tips apparently arrive, she says “thank you” five times and tells her husband she will agree to that act.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/09/11/susanna-gibson-sex-website-virginia-candidate/
[/quote]

She did not put it on the other website for public viewing. Some a$$wipe did that. AFTER she entered the race. Very telling. 
[/quote]

She operated a chat room on a chaturbate which is a public website.

There are people who then archive all those public chats in real time (a quick search suggest “archivebate” is one if you want to take a look).  She was not singled out for archiving. [/quote]

No, it was a private forum on an adult website. Not a public site.

She was live streaming in a private “room” on an adult website. Someone actively decided to record her via screen recording. Then that person uploaded their recording of her to a different website AFTER her campaign started. That person recorded and distributed a video of her with malicious intent and without her direct consent.

She was dumb to do this and run for office but this other person acted unethically. 
[/quote]

Again, as posted above she was in a public chat room. There are websites that archive all of those chat rooms, not just hers.

In that recording she offered to go to private chat room for cash. See this helpful primer from the chaturbate website!

https://support.chaturbate.com/hc/en-us/articles/360035946951-How-do-I-start-a-private-show-[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics