Reply to RTO in many cases is the height of hubris.

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "RTO in many cases is the height of hubris. "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I know at my place a lot of the white males in management are unhappy the younger women aren't available to them with WFH and that is a major factor in the RTO decision.  Obviously they are in leadership roles so there's no one to challenge their decision.[/quote]

Exactly.  The opportunity to sexually harass is seriously diminished, and [b]people are also being judged by work product and not nepotism[/b] etc - makes sense when you think who’s pushing the movement the most strongly. [/quote]

This is a real thing. It's not just harassment, it's the manager who likes to have someone bring coffee and paperwork, who likes to watch a gaggle of cute interns, who judges competence based on appearance and small talk, and who enjoys seeing someone stay late. That type of manager thrives on control of the physical space and control of people's physical presence.

Then you have another kind of manager who would never sexually harass anyone, but who creates a lot of low-level HR issues involving discrimination, bias, thoughtless comments, unfair policies, employee turnover, etc. This is a person who has given little thought to what the job of manager actually is, and who genuinely doesn't know how to manage except by counting heads. Being physically separate from them can be beneficial, even though these managers are not "harassers" per se.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics