Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Boy applicant pool has lower acceptance rate at LACs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If a (hypothetical) male applicant had the same profile as a (hypothetical) female — identical grades, rigor, test scores, EC profile, recs, etc. — the edge at most LACs would go to the male. Not saying he's *definitely* getting in over her, but he's statistically more likely to. Many AOs have come out and said this directly. (No, it's not illegal, not even after SCOTUS ruling). Thing is, most males are not applying with the same profile as their female counterparts. For whatever reason, girls tend to outperform boys in school. They get higher grades. They join clubs at higher rates. They participate more in the arts and music. They volunteer more. So, yes. A school can accept girls at a higher rate while simultaneously giving the "all things being equal" edge to boys. These things are not contradictory, because for whatever reason, all things are not equal. I don't know why they're not. The "why" has been extensively discussed on other threads. [/quote] This post sums it up nicely.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics