Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "The Kowalski v. Johns Hopkins verdict is a legal travest"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP, You are being incredibly insensitive and hurtful to the victims, and you are enabling the perpetrators. I say this as a scientist and the spouse of a doctor. My husband knows what malpractice looks like in a hospital setting and he'd be the first to tell you that Johns Hopkins deserved to be sued. Stop focusing on the amount of money, and focus on who is responsible for the trauma this family endured. Shame on you. [/quote] OP here. When your husband or his workplace gets sued because some patient didn't like what he did or considered it malpractice, come back and tell me if he still thinks Johns Hopkins deserved to be sued. Would you like it if as a scientist one of your clients complained about you or sued you in court. [/quote] You seem to think people can be awarded millions of dollars simply for suing, even if their complaints have no merit. That’s not how it works. If you haven’t suffered real damages, you’re unlikely to even get a lawyer to represent you because they only get paid a percentage of whatever settlement or monetary award you receive. They won’t even take the case if they doubt they’d make money off of it.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics