Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Scarcity of "elite college" slots in US relative to other countries"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So you want everyone to get in and nobody to have to pay full price, correct?[/quote] Nah. Those schools could increase their supply 5x, keep their acceptance rates at 5%, and still get plenty of takers for "full pay".[/quote] If T20 schools went from 1500 freshman/6K undergrads to 7500 freshman/30K undergrads, they would not be nearly as attractive. There is not space to build more dorm, or at least not enough dorms, no room for classes or space for professor offices. Harvard would just be a UMichigan but one without any infrastructure in place. [/quote] Baloney. They could absolutely do it and maintain their elite status. Severely restricting the number of slots is a deliberate choice. [/quote] Please tell me where these people would live if 6000 freshman arrived at a campus that houses 1500. Or 30,000 showed up on a campus made for 7500. The year that Virginia Tech overenrolled by 1000, they paid people to defer for a year and took over a hotel off campus to house the kids who came. There were long lines at dining halls, which made people late for class. People sitting in the aisles in lecture halls. [/quote] Straw man. No one is saying colleges need to do this tomorrow. But they don’t even show any signs of wanting to do it, of taking steps to do so in the future. What they want is to preserve the exclusivity; to have kids clamoring for what 95% cannot have. I am quite confident the brain trust of Stanford could, if properly motivated, use a bit more of the fallow 5,000 acres of its contiguous land. If colleges like Harvard can’t accomplish this with the size of their endowments and political connections, I question either how smart they are or how motivated they are. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics