Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Iready"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Iready is a valid test. Those whose children score poorly on it will naturally discount it. The kid didn't try, wanted to go to recess, etc. You'll see the excuses come out for the non-motivated students. That provides insight into the academic and emotional iq of that child. Some children are bright, very few are exceptional. Like very few.[/quote] Teacher here. It is not a valid test for above average kids. With kids with severe gaps then yes. It is meant to be a screener. Which is why I don’t understand why they need to take it more than once. [/quote] +1 at my kids’ school it seems to be only used to identify those kids who are below grade level and need extra help, especially in terms of pull-outs for reading. If the kid scores within average range or even high it doesn’t change anything. [/quote] Another teacher here. It's also used for AAP (the files all contain references to the i-ready). I HATE the test but the county pushed it in order to stop having teachers spend time doing individual assessments like the DRA that take a long time to do but are MASSIVELY more useful. It's a central decision and they spent a lot of money on licensing, so we're stuck until the next good idea bubbles out of the gatehouse.[/quote] [b]A question for teachers - WHY do kids in AAP, who have demonstrated time and time again that they are advanced and doing just fine academically, have to take iReady two times every year?!?[/b] [/quote] That isn’t a question for teachers. They don’t know, they probably agree with you and have no say. TBH my AAP kid had a harder time in Iready in grades 1,2 because he took it very seriously and got questions beyond his grade level that he would sit there and do. For example, he would do repeated addition because he hadn’t been taught multiplication and then answer the question correctly, so be put into the next level. The poor kid had to go back to finish during specials time and recess the day he took it. As he matured, he realized it meant nothing and stopped giving it the time of day. It is just stupid all around, but I think it was the dyslexia lobbying who wanted a universal screener and pushed for it in VA that actually is the reason why it is being used. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics