Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you can force people to make gay websites, you can also force them to make websites advocating for Pizza gate, or force them to make evangelical Christian websites. Be careful what you wish for-- any weapon you create can be used against you. [/quote] This is where I'm choosing to come at this being a win for the first amendment, and I'm a liberal. I think we're taking too many hits to the first amendment and this case at least distinguishes her speech section of the website development, and the rest of it. They stipulated in the facts that she creates other websites that are non-wedding related and that she does that regardless of who they are. So if the website is for someone else's business, making stationary, or jewelry, or whatever, she's going to design that website no matter who comes to her. But her "business design" for the wedding sites involves all this speech around her creating a story of the couple, etc. which distinguishes it from the other portion of the business. It makes her look like an a$$ and is probably super disingenuous, but it also helps to stave off the crazies who are going to want to apply this to all businesses. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics