Reply to Biden nominees

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Biden nominees"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How is that a trick question??[/quote]

It’s a trick question because literally no one would know the answer. [/quote]

But a lot of people of this thread, including non lawyers, are telling you they know the answer.[/quote]

I’m a lawyer who knows the answers. Both of them. So, I would also ask for clarification about whether he was talking about a motion under the Brady Bill (which is a 2A issue) or concerning the Brady case.  The ignorant people are the ones who don’t consider that h there is also a 2A Brady Bill (named after the Agent shot protecting Reagan). [/quote]

Wait, you think a judge would see a motion based on a law that sunsetted in 2004? [/quote]

Brady did not sunset in 2004.  Where did you get that idea?  Pretty embarrassing mistake from a legal eagle like you.[/quote]

The Brady bill PP was talking about did. Reading comprehension not your strong suit? [/quote]
No it did not. The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act and the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, which was the part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, are different.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics