Reply to D.C. City Council Has Given Up on Improving Schools

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "D.C. City Council Has Given Up on Improving Schools"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Honest question: do you all really not understand that this has little to do with politicians and everything to do with the DCUM demographic refusing to send their kids to school with poor kids? Or is this more like willful ignorance to avoid facing your complicity?

This is the most obvious thing in the world. Think of your child's school. Wherever it may be. Imagine another child coming into the classroom that comes from poverty, deep trauma, parents in jail, parents abuse drugs or alcohol, parents abuse the child, or maybe there aren't any parents at all.

How would even the most amazing suburban school address that child's needs? What resources would they need to invest to make sure that little girl or boy gets a good education, does not disrupt others learning? How much effort will it take to change that kid's life path to ensure that they don't end up carjacking you in 10 years time?

Now, imagine putting two of those kids in your child's classroom. 5, 10, 15, 20. To make it work, you would need experienced, excellent teachers, counselors/social workers, multiple aides (in many cases, children need their own aide to keep them and classmates safe).

Have DC schools EVER gotten anywhere near the amount of resources that would be needed to adequately serve the population of poor, traumatized children? The system is set up to fail. There is no way for any politician, administrator, or teacher to serve these schools that cluster all the difficult kids together so your Larla doesn't have to ever have one of them in her classroom.

You have three choices here:

(1) Advocate for schools to be truly mixed. Legal maximum of 15%-20% poor kids in a school - schools can handle this percentage without falling apart.

(2) Keep the schools as they are, but advocate for you to pay higher taxes and have all that money go to bring in top teachers and many more aides and counselors to the schools with concentrations of poor kids. This is still not as good as #1 because there are no privileged parents acting as a check on administrators and ensuring that kids get a good education. Poor parents (even involved ones) don't have the time and skills to do that, which is why bringing in upper middle class parents (despite the downsides of them "taking over") works.

(3) Admit that you are ok to doom someone else's children to poverty (at best) and cycle of trauma, abuse, crime, drugs, etc. (at worst). Assert that it's not your problem - though, the rising crime that you're so upset about is a direct result of y'all screwing over so many children because you only care about yourselves. [/quote]

There are not enough middle class kids to go around. Do you live in this city?[/quote]

Sorry to say I’m sure she does. This is the way the governing class in DC is now thinking about “equity.” You can look forward to proposals to do away with IB schools and start a city-wide lottery this year. [/quote]

You don't understand. There are "literally" in the true since of the word not enough middle class kids in the entire city, even with a citywide lottery, to the percentages that dingbat suggested. Nuke all the charters and it would still be so. Spread all the middle class kids around equally and you would still have every school with a vast majority of poor students. I can't believe how ignorant of your city some of you are.

[/quote]

I don't think anyone is ignorant of the demographics of DC...the point is that these policies need to be set on a federal level. UMC/wealthy people will always try to separate themselves - any race, any culture, any period through history. They will find workarounds unless it's a clear, strict requirement.

The only other solution floated here - make DC schools attractive to wealthier families so they stick around - is not feasible. To make a school that serves majority poor children attractive would require a huge, huge investment of funds, which no one is lining up to provide. [/quote]

Amazing that you so casually dictate that a solution that *improves the quality of academics* is totally unfeasible in DC. Many schools show it is feasible - Hardy, Deal, Hill ES and some Hill MS, some “HRCS” as well. Literally all you have to do is demonstrate to the MC/UMC parents (who are NOT all white btw) that the school will be safe and provide and appropriate curriculum, and that all are welcome. That’s it. [/quote]

Not PP, but these schools have a sizable number of MC/UMC families in-bound, and I don't think that's what PP is talking about. Try taking a school in Ward 7 or 8 that serves largely poor children and transforming it so that UMC/MC opt to send their kids there. I imagine it's quite difficult unless you transform the demographics of the neighborhood. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics