Reply to Hannah Natanson at it again

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Hannah Natanson at it again"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The character was reflecting on his own personal memories from his own childhood. It was significant to him because it was his sexual awakening. Kids have sexual thoughts, actions, memories.

There is nothing wrong with that.

It’s not pornography. 
It’s not child pornography. 
It’s not pedophilia.

No matter how much you want it to be. It’s creepy that people view it like that. Maybe they’re projecting. 
 [/quote]

Definition of the word pornography: printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.

It absolutely does show that.[/quote]

No sexual organs were displayed. 
It wasn’t intended to stimulate erotic feelings.

Not pornography. 
[/quote]

Page 73:

“All I could think about while he was chatting me up over the rim of his cappuccino was his little salamander between my fourth-grade fingers, rapidly engorging with blood.”

Not intended to stimulate erotic feelings at all. Nothing to see here. 
[/quote]

Just vote blue no matter who. There is plenty of material in FCPS libraries to teach your son or daughter on how to prepare themselves for anal penetration, destigmatizes sex work, and advocates are calling for free anonymous HIV testing AND treatment. So for all those worrying parents out there, what they don't know won't hurt their feelings, problem solved. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics