Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
The DCUM Book Club
Reply to "Bookish Quirks & Icks"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Authors that describe a character as “Black” or as a POC — when they don’t directly mention the race of any of the other characters. It’s like they assume that everyone assumes that the default for a human being is white. White characters are described by detailed characteristics. POC characters are often described primarily or even only by their race or color. (An elderly man, with the severe dignity of a priest, paused near the doorway, watching as a black woman walked down the steps.) — This is the sort of thing I mean. Once I started noticing this, I can’t not see it. Related is the propensity for white writers to describe POC as food. Skin tones are: chocolate, caramel, honey, almond, coffee….. Which stands out to me because non-POC characters are rarely described that way …. Pale, sallow, rosy ….are more typical. Then there are the stereotypes, but that’s a much more complex issue. I’ll simply say that I’ve given up on one otherwise favorite author’s ability to move beyond comfortable tropes with the one Black repeating character. She did try — but her inadequacies with this character are particularly evident when neither the author’s descriptions of the character nor her sexless ability to continually comfort the more complexly written and varied white characters ever changes — over the course of almost 20 books. Vent, vent, vent. Rant, rant, rant. Exhale. [/quote] I totally get you, and the food thing is especially awful. But here's a sincere question. White people avoid writing from a POC's POV because they almost always do it horribly (you're right about stereotypes) and it's cultural appropriation. But whites represent the majority of writers, if nothing else because they're the majority in the broader population. So, just by the numbers, the default kind of is to have a white POV. And, if the priest watches an elderly woman full stop, many will assume she's white, again just by the population numbers. Do you have any ideas for identifying race respectfully? Identifying the race of every single character when they're introduced seems really clunky. There may be no easy answer and that's fine.[/quote] I’m not clear that “whites represent the majority of writers” or “the majority in the broader population “. I am clear that they represent the majority of mainstream publishers though. Rather than rant about your assumptions, I’ll skip to your question. The simplest answer is that good writers often SHOW rather than TELL. If there are reasons for race to be explicitly identified, it can be done in the same, subtle or detailed ways that any other important characteristics are — including the character’s own musings and comments. So if a writer starts with assuming that there are NO defaults, and that they have to introduce all of their characters to all of their readers, then it should work out fine. You don’t actually have to identify the race of every single character “when they’re introduced”. Timmy and Karin can chat and interact for several pages or even several chapters before one mentions her stern Nordic grandfather and another mentions the family latke recipe while they make lefse together. A writer might leave it out altogether. Or a writer could notice that mentioning only some people as having a race — is Othering these characters, alienating at least some readers, and work to be better if that was not their intent. I get that it can be clumsy to write effectively and sensitivity about people who are very different from you as a writer. That’s what research is for. And what having readers to critique your manuscripts before you publish them are for. If a writer has NO readers who resemble their characters in essential ways, then I would respectfully ask them to ask themselves why they’re including the character — and what they can do as a WRITER to make these characters as authentic and as complex as the rest of their characters— however authentic and complex that might actually be. [/quote] Be very careful about including characters who don't resemble you. You don't want to be the next American Dirt. I'm sure that author (who had a Puerto Rican grandmother) had many friends read it, and Latino critics and Oprah were initially really welcoming, until the fierce backlash about her writing about Mexicans.[/quote] That was horrible what they did to that author. That was a great read! One of my favorites of the year. I was really taken aback by the reaction, and pissed on the authors behalf. They screwed her. On the plus side, she was on the bestsellers list for weeks & weeks; on the negative side, her reputation is ruined. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics