Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Biden earns “Bottomless Pinocchio” from WaPo fact checker"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Glenn Kessler called the veracity of the 10 y.o. OH girl needing an abortion as if it is EVER OKAY WHEN A 10 Y.O. IS PREGNANT. So nah, I am still waiting for Kessler to give himself a "Bottomless Pinocchio."[/quote] Uh - no, he did not. He said he was simply waiting for more than the one source to speak out about the case. As he put it, "journalism is an accumulation of facts," which it is. But it's so good of you to lie, again.[/quote] Link to his mea culpa then. [/quote] He should apologize for doing HIS JOB - that is, verifying leads, sources, stories?? You people are crazy. [/quote] Lol. He was [i]wrong[/i] when he claimed that there was no ten year old rape victim who had to travel across state lines. He didn’t do his job that time, just as he isn’t doing his job this time. The choice is the politics of the party of Joe Biden. The Democratic Party offers decency, thoughtful policy and DEMOCRACY. The Republican Party offers immoral criminals, corruption, projection, treason and sedition, zero policy and FASCISM. Covering these two entities as if they’re the same isn’t good journalism, it’s giving the GOP a leg up. It’s journalistic malpractice. And you have no idea about any of this as evidenced by the fact that you couldn’t even follow this strand of the thread. [/quote] That you think the “job” of ANY journalist is somehow boosting one party over the other is beyond telling. No, twit. The job of a journalist - one with integrity, anyway - is reporting substantiated facts. He was not going to confirm or deny until he had the facts to back it up. It’s sickening that you don’t get that. I have a feeling you don’t know the meaning of the word integrity.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics