Reply to Curriculum 2.0

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Curriculum 2.0"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ok - found the article.  In short, for those who are wondering, there was a class listed as AP American History, that was made up of both student in the IB program and students who wanted to take the AP course.  It appears the the IB curriculum for be class (which covers from 1860s to the presnt) was used instead of the AP curriculum (which covers from the 1600's to the present).  Bottom line, beside the obvious , that the problem should have be corrected months ago, is hat he AP students will nt be prepared for the AP exam.

My first question is, why did be teacher wait so long to file a compliant with the administration?

I thnk this demonstrates a problem not with the central administration, but that principals have too much independence.  They should have fixed he problem in August.[/quote]

You miss the point--a teacher had the courage to stand up for what is right.  Parents need to inundate MCPS with their opinions on Curriculum 2.0.  If you can't tell the truth to power--DON'T COMPLAIN.   Here again are the emails:
BOE@mcpsmd.org
Roland_Ikheloa@mcpsmd.org (Ombudsman)
Joshua_Starr@mcpsmd.org
Marty_Creel@mcpsmd.org
Erick_J_Lang@mcpsmd.org

Here's the story about the teacher: http://www.gazette.net/article/20120425/NEWS/704259527/1007/teacher-speaks-out-against-combining-advanced-courses-at-richard&template=gazette
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics