Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Waste – FCPS School Facilities"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just don't think it is sound fiscal policy to build additional capacity on the basis that it may be needed some day in the distant future. Especially when there is existing capacity to handle the growth. Or to build additional capacity in a school to handle overcrowding and then immediately move students out (to the point there is a large surplus of space). This was the case with Lewis and Springfield Estates. Nor is it okay to mislead on the size of expansions. But hey, it is just taxpayer's money.[/quote] This is all common sense, but clearly there are some beneficiaries of FCPS’s incompetent, discriminatory approach to planning who are prepared to support the blatant waste and harm to others as long as they personally made out OK. [/quote] External, independent auditors who assess building plans for school systems across the country disagree with you. Fairfax's buildings and operations plans consistently receive high marks. Fairfax doesn't get to just decide these things on their own you know? There's a whole regulatory process which includes eliminating waste. External auditors consistently recommend adding additional capacity at low cost during needed renovations because it tends on average to be worth it. [/quote] That's sensible. So now, when external, independent auditors tell FCPS that issues of equity and high disparity in outcomes based on pyramid need to be addressed, our FCPS families shouldn't be vehemently against such actions. E.g. the final recommendations of the boundary review consultants from last December were met with opposition since it was made clear that boundaries right now strongly favor high-SES families.[/quote] Those sessions were a joke and not based on sound fiscal policy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics