Reply to MS Acceleration Question

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "MS Acceleration Question"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]From what I’ve observed of my child’s AIM class this year, what is covered in AIM is not the same as what was covered in compacted math. So even if there’s some overlap in topics, AIM will not just be a review of compacted math. [/quote]

This.  It’s a valuable class.  [/quote]

I'd be very cautious about putting a child in Algebra in 8th. There is a developmental aspect to math learning. If you put a child into a class before they are developmentally ready for the abstract aspects of the math, they will flounder.

For one of our children, who developed math skills early and took AIM in 5th, AIM was a complete waste.  We should have had that child take Algebra in 5th.

Our other child, who was also a high-performing student, wasn't as quick to develop abstract math skills. We held that child back in math against the school's recommendation and had them take AIM in 7th and Algebra in 8th, and they did great in math.  I think for that child if we had pushed Algebra earlier, the child never would have caught up.   [/quote]

you are making stuff up right? "developmentally ready"? define that for us please.[/quote]

I would say, If Child is consistently scoring high in maths well about grade level, you should ask for Algebra 1 in 6th grade. Kids adapts well and they will continue to make progress at same rate while others who hold back will watch from the sidelines. I would never recommend anyone to hold back their child inconsistent in their performance quarter affter quarter or year after year.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics