Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Use of full stop is such a great midwit identifier. [/quote] Good job not engaging with any facts or logic and just resorting to name calling and portraying me as dumb. Hey, it worked for Depp.[/quote] Name calling isn’t DV. The long post above fails to mention what was obvious to most: Amber had an agenda, and she worked hard to fuel situations she could use as future evidence for her exit strategy. Her new plan is to double down on the victim narrative in the hope of redeeming her reputation by becoming a champion of survivors. She knows that’s the only way to salvage a career. This is a classic PR move. The fact is, she isn’t a DV survivor. She just had a toxic relationship. Not the same thing. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
