Reply to Why are conservatives creepy? OH legislature votes to require genital inspections for kids’ sports

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Why are conservatives creepy? OH legislature votes to require genital inspections for kids’ sports "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Legalizing the molestation of minors.  Any DR that agrees to this is suspect. [/quote]
I hesitate to say this because I don’t want anyone to misconstrue my comment as support for this bill, but from what I could find online (weird that the actual bill isn’t quoted in this thread at all) it appears that the text of the bill states that if the sex of an athlete is questioned, there are 3 ways the athlete can prove their sex, and one of them is with a note from a doctor, stating their sex based on external observations. Your sex would be part of your medical records, so your doctor should be able to write such a note without having to perform any new exams.

This bill is problematic, but it doesn’t suggest that anyone other than one’s doctor should be examining one’s genitalia.[/quote]

You are wrong. The bill requires an internal gyn. exam. On a child who may not have even entered puberty (my very thin daughter did menstrate because she is so thin. She is defiantly female— in sex, in gender. But she was too thin to make estrogen (below 5% BMI) and that would not have been an option. And how many parents can afford to do a full genetic sequence on their kid?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/petergreene/2022/06/03/ohio-legislators-want-to-check-childrens-gender/?sh=1e575f343ad0

Read and learn what they are doing to women at a time when eating disorders and other body image issues are rampant.

I’ll take the 5 trans athletes, thanks. 
[/quote]
Would you mind citing the passage that you think makes an internal gynecological exam is required? It doesn’t read that way to me.[/quote]

#1. Examination of a participant’s INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL reproductive anatomy. [/quote]
The word “examination” isn’t used. It’s “ The participant’s internal and external reproductive anatomy.” I don’t believe a pelvic exam is required. You just get your pediatrician to sign a note stating which kind of anatomy your kid has. Should others be able to force you to do that? No, of course not. A birth certificate should suffice. However, I don’t believe pediatricians are going to perform pelvic exams due to this bill.[/quote]
Look at the amount of excuses you have to make to excuse your party’s pedophilia - under the guise of “protecting women athletes,” of course. Republicans truly are the Gross Old Perverts. [/quote]

I’m still waiting to see how PP thinks internal female anatomy is verified without a pelvic exam. [/quote]

External ultrasound  :roll: [/quote]

Cool, next time I go in for a pelvic exam I’ll tell them DCUM said an external US would do the trick. Spoiler alert: not so much. Maybe a transvaginal US. Maybe. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics