Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Explain to me the American mindset around work, entitlement, and earning"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's because Republicans hate poor people who don't look like them. That's all there is to it.[/quote] Agreed. I remember watching a show on this topic and they asked a white woman [b]why the US couldn’t be more like Scandinavia[/b] (more social spending, etc…) and I remember being so shocked by her answer. She basically said “all Scandinavians are “the same people”…implying…”white” and that she was okay paying taxes that benefited other white people. But the US is “different” and she would not be okay paying into such a system….Sad (and racist). [/quote] I am extremely curious what your take on this would be. The answer ought to be pretty funny and revealing of your ignorance on the topic. [/quote] The US already pays a huge amount in social spending. Looking at federal and state means tested programs, along with charities, almost $1 trillion every year. About $17,500 every year for every person under the poverty line. I’m not happy with the outcomes for that social spending, and I’d rather explore why that is, rather than simply spend more.[/quote] PP here. I understand your point. But the other side of the argument is that the outcomes of the social spending are unsatisfactory because we have not spent enough - we have not crossed over an inflection point where the social programs become truly life-changing rather than just placing band-aids on structural issues. There is nothing uniquely capable/superior/different about Scandanavians that make them especially suitable for implementing social benefits. Indeed, they failed at this spectacularly leading up to the 1990s, leading to a significant drawback on the level of social benefits. We may argue that their current level seems much more sustainable. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics