Reply to Proposed legislation would ban legacy preference at colleges, universities across New York

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Proposed legislation would ban legacy preference at colleges, universities across New York"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wonderful.  I hope it’s banned everywhere.  It’s a joke.[/quote]

+1.[/quote]
+1  I started a thread about how legacy is basically racist because it mostly helps rich white people.  I got slammed for that thread, probably by legacies.

I stated something similar to her:

[quote]"we are supposed to live in a democracy, not an aristocracy,".. "To me, it's one of the most blatant examples of unfairness and inequality,"[/quote]

Of course, the people at the top want to continue with it because it benefits them.

The argument is not that different to what liberals say about how white men support Trump because they are afraid of losing power as a group.[/quote]

When did colleges ever claim that admissions is entirely meritocratic or "democratic"? They can and do value all sorts of things that you might think are unfair or irrelevant. As long as they're not engaging in unlawful discrimination, what's your argument against that?[/quote]

Typical response from a legacy admit.

It's not illegal, but it's wrong.  As stated, it benefits mostly rich white people.

You only want the US to be a "democracy" when it comes to some things, but apparently, not when it comes to your little snowflake who probably couldn't make it into an ivy without legacy.

Legacy was originally used by elite institutions much like holistic admission was -- to keep the undesirables out.

The whole "pull yourself up by your boostraps" only applies to the middle/lower class. For rich people, they have legacy to prop them up.[/quote]

The US has also always respected the ability of private institutions to govern themselves, why do you think government should be able to tell a private group who to admit? [/quote]
It's not about who they have to admit, but what criteria it's using.[/quote]

Same difference[/quote]
of course, to legacies.

But, one can only assume that universities refuse to release legacy admit profiles because they know their stats aren't that great.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/23/elite-schools-ivy-league-legacy-admissions-harvard-wealthier-whiter

Students at some of those universities petitioned for the universities to release the data. Unsurprisingly, they didn't.

I bet they are hiding the fact that legacy admits largely don't have that impressive stats, especially considering their background.

You can claim that private institutions can do whatever it wants, but [b]that doesn't mean that what they are doing is right.[/b]  Legacies benefit rich white people the most. That's it.  It was a practice rooted in racism, and [/b]it is still that way today.[b][/quote]

When did your subjective view of what is right or fair ever properly enter the equation as something that is relevant? Again, it’s not up to outsiders to define a university’s mission for it.

As to the second bolded statement, that is simply not true today.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics