Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They could just have a lost year. No 2026.[/quote] Nope. There was nothing in that ruling that said they had to abandon decisions for this year. It’s next year and beyond that will be changed. [/quote] When a party is "enjoined" from something, it doesn't mean next year. It means immediately, unless a stay is issued by the court or a higher court stays the ruling in some fashion. Federal judges are not known for their sense of humor on these points. And federal courts don't just wait around til "next year" to see if you'll maybe, possibly, pretty please address the unconstitutional harm that you have caused. FCPS cannot use that admissions system unless the 4th Circuit steps in. And the Circuit Court of Appeals will not do so until asked to by FCPS, which even then is not a given and will likely take some time. At this point, FCPS will need to come up with an alternative process regardless unless they wish risking contempt charges. FCPS is running out of time on all fronts. I feel for the kids involved in this process.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics