Reply to Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This could also go in the lunatics attacking the Capitol thread

[twitter]https://twitter.com/tripgabriel/status/1496095921855152133[/twitter][/quote]

This was an excellent and very long article.  One of the reporters has three Pulitzers.  90% of you won't bother to read it but it's chilling how many irons she has in the RWNJ fire.  She sure is caught up in anti choice zealotry for someone who never bothered to have kids.

Clarence needs to retire.  He's corrupt and should have recused himself numerous times.  He was allowed to revise years old sworn financal statements to reflect $700k in income from organizations with business before the Supreme Court. If The Court wants to regain the faith of the American people they should clean themselves up.  [/quote]
“ Ginni Thomas, who turns 65 on April 25, did not respond to requests for comment, and Justice Thomas, who is 73, declined to comment through a court spokesperson. In a posting on a private Facebook group for her high school classmates, Ginni Thomas wrote that “a NYT reporter” might have “contacted you looking for stories, etc on me. This reporter seems to have been told to write a hit piece” and “has knocked on many doors and written many emails. They all contact me and are not responding. 😁” she wrote. “Whatever. 🤷‍♀️” (The message was forwarded by one of those classmates to the reporter in question.)”

I enjoyed this paragraph. Someone doesn’t like Mrs. Thomas as much as Mrs. Thomas thinks everyone does. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics