Reply to 43 is too old for a baby, right?

Forum Index » General Parenting Discussion

Reply to "43 is too old for a baby, right?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My SIL gave birth to my nephew two weeks after turning 43. They're both perfectly healthy, no complications while pregnant or giving birth. [b]He just turned two.[/b] [/quote]

LOL

This shows how delusional people are. So much can happen in the first few years of life. To think you’re in the clear just because you haven’t hit any roadblocks yet is incredibly naive. Since we’re trading anectodes, my own nephew developed normally until age 3.5 then just stopped talking and was diagnosed with Autism. His parents are so stressed taking him to therapy after therapy. Another poster with no family history mentioned her daughter was diagnosed with diabetes at age 8. At age 2 you know absolutely nothing.

[/quote]

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease. Anyone can get it, you don't need a family history. And diabetes isn't a death sentence in 2022.[/quote]

Diabetes parent here you have no idea what you are talking about. It takes about 50K of equipment every year and countless appointments to keep my child alive not to mention what it takes to keep them healthy. I did wakes up all night long for years to keep my child at a near normal blood sugar range. If even one piece of equipment or medication isn't available my child is dead, brain dead or in the hospital.

Type I diabetes isn't like your Grandma or Aunt's type 2 diabetes that they ignore. You do die from insulin or type zo diabetes easily if you don't care for it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics